Some Facts About Chaining or Tethering
Dogs
The Humane
Society of the United States
What
is meant by "chaining" or "tethering"
dogs?
These
terms refer to the practice of fastening
a dog to a stationary object or stake,
usually in the owner's backyard, as a
means of keeping the animal under
control. These terms do not refer to the
periods when an animal is walked on a
leash.
Is
there a problem with continuous chaining
or tethering?
Yes,
the practice is both inhumane and a
threat to the safety of the confined
dog, other animals, and humans.
Why
is tethering dogs inhumane?
Dogs
are naturally social beings who thrive
on interaction with human beings and
other animals. A dog kept chained
in one spot for hours, days, months, or
even years suffers immense psychological
damage. An otherwise friendly and
docile dog, when kept continuously
chained, becomes neurotic, unhappy,
anxious, and often aggressive. In
many cases, the necks of chained dogs
become raw and covered with sores, the
result of improperly fitted collars and
the dogs' constant yanking and straining
to escape confinement. Dogs have even
been found with collars embedded in
their necks, the result of years of
neglect at the end of a chain.
Who
says tethering dogs is inhumane?
In
addition to The Humane Society of the
United States and numerous animal
experts, the U. S. Department of
Agriculture (USDA) issued a statement in
the July 2, 1996, Federal Register
against tethering: "Our experience in
enforcing the Animal Welfare Act has led
us to conclude that continuous
confinement of dogs by a tether is
inhumane. A tether significantly
restricts a dog's movement. A
tether can also become tangled around or
hooked on the dog's shelter structure or
other objects, further restricting the
dog's movement and potentially causing
injury."
How
does tethering or chaining dogs pose a
danger to humans?
Dogs
tethered for long periods can become
highly aggressive. Dogs feel naturally
protective of their territory; when
confronted with a perceived threat, they
respond according to their
fight-or-flight instinct. A
chained dog, unable to take flight,
often feels forced to fight, attacking
any unfamiliar animal or person who
unwittingly wanders into his or her
territory. Numerous attacks on
people by tethered dogs have been
documented. For example, a study
published in the September 15, 2000,
issue of the Journal of the American
Veterinary Medical Association reported
that 17% of dogs involved in fatal
attacks on humans between 1979 and 1998
were restrained on their owners'
property at the time of the attack.
Tragically, the victims of such attacks
are often children who are unaware of
the chained dog's presence until it is
too late. Furthermore, a tethered dog
who finally does get loose from his
chains may remain aggressive, and is
likely to chase and attack unsuspecting
passersby and pets.
Why
is tethering dangerous to dogs?
In
addition to the psychological damage
wrought by continuous chaining, dogs
forced to live on a chain make easy
targets for other animals, humans, and
biting insects.
A chained animal may suffer harassment
and teasing from insensitive humans,
stinging bites from insects, and, in the
worst cases, attacks by other animals.
Chained dogs are also easy targets for
thieves looking to steal animals for
sale to research institutions or to be
used as training fodder for organized
animal fights. Finally, dogs'
tethers can become entangled with other
objects, which can choke or strangle the
dogs to death.
Are
tethered dogs otherwise treated well?
Rarely
does a chained or tethered dog receive
sufficient care. Tethered dogs suffer
from sporadic feedings, overturned water
bowls, inadequate veterinary care, and
extreme temperatures. During periods of
extreme heat, they may not receive
adequate water or protection from the
sun. What's more, because their often
neurotic behavior makes them difficult
to approach, chained dogs are rarely
given even minimal affection. Tethered
dogs may become "part of the scenery"
and can be easily ignored by their
owners. The HSUS recommends that
all dogs be kept indoors at night, taken
on regular walks, and otherwise provided
with adequate attention, food, water,
and veterinary care. If an animal
must be housed outside at certain times,
he should be placed in a suitable pen
with adequate square footage and shelter
from the elements.
Should
chaining or tethering ever be allowed?
To
become well-adjusted companion animals,
dogs should interact regularly with
people and other animals, and should
receive regular exercise. It is an
owner's responsibility to properly
restrain her dog, just as it is the
owner's responsibility to provide
adequate attention and socialization.
Placing an animal on a restraint to get
fresh air can be acceptable if it
is done for a short period. However,
keeping an animal tethered for long
periods is never acceptable.
What
about attaching a dog's leash to a
"pulley run"?
Attaching a dog's leash to a long
line—such as a clothesline or a
manufactured device known as a pulley
run—and letting the animal have a larger
area in which to explore is preferable
to tethering the dog to a stationary
object. However, many of the same
problems associated with tethering still
apply, including attacks on or by other
animals, lack of socialization, and
safety.
What
can be done to correct the problem of
tethering dogs?
At
least 25 communities have passed laws
that regulate the practice of tethering
animals.
Maumelle, Arkansas; Tucson, Arizona; and
New Hanover, North Carolina, are a few
communities that prohibit the chaining
or tethering of dogs as a means of
continuous confinement. Many other
communities allow tethering only under
certain conditions.
Why
should a community outlaw the continuous
chaining or tethering of dogs?
Animal
control and humane agencies receive
countless calls every day from citizens
concerned about animals in these cruel
situations. Animal control
officers, paid at taxpayer expense,
spend many hours trying to educate pet
owners about the dangers and cruelty
involved in this practice. A
chained animal is caught in a vicious
cycle; frustrated by long periods of
boredom and social isolation, he becomes
a neurotic shell of his former
self—further deterring human interaction
and kindness. In the end, the
helpless dog can only suffer the
frustration of watching the world go by
in isolation—a cruel fate for what is by
nature a highly social animal. Any
city, county, or state that bans this
practice is a safer, more humane
community.